The November election is shaping up to be a coronavirus debacle of long lines at the polls, lost mail-in ballots and delayed results — all of which will give losers on both sides ample room to challenge the outcome.

The November election is shaping up to be a coronavirus debacle of long lines at the polls, lost mail-in ballots and delayed results — all of which will give losers on both sides ample room to challenge the outcome.

The November election is shaping up to be a coronavirus debacle of long lines at the polls, lost mail-in ballots and delayed results — all of which will give losers on both sides ample room to challenge the outcome.
President Trump’s suggestion last week the election be postponed drew little support from either Republicans or Democrats, but the president did identify a serious problem when he pointed out that New York is still counting votes from its botched June primaries.
The state has invalidated tens of thousands of ballots and has yet to declare winners in some of the June 23 contests, which were seen as an early test of the push to expand mail-in balloting.
Republicans warn of mischief if mail-in voting predominates nationwide, and Mr. Trump has said he’s not sure he’ll accept the results.
Democrats, for their part, say in-person voting is dangerous. They are pushing to expand mail as far as possible — though they charge Mr. Trump is undercutting the U.S. Postal Service in a backdoor attempt to threaten mail-in voting.
Mr. Biden has assembled a team of 600 lawyers and more than 10,000 election observers to prevent what he called election “chicanery.”
Mr. Trump’s backers see that as Mr. Biden’s own attempt to steal the contest.
“It is clear that when President Trump is re-elected, the left will not accept that election result any more than they did the one four years ago which brought the president to office,” said Rick Manning, president of the conservative advocacy group Americans for Limited Government.
While voter-ID requirements and time frames for early voting are perennial fights, this year the major debate is over voting by mail, and how easy states should make it during the coronavirus pandemic.
Democrats and liberal-leaning voter groups have rushed to courthouses in more than a dozen states asking judges to expand opportunities.
Some states have agreed to make the changes on their own.
Rhode Island agreed to relax requirements for witness signatures on mailed ballots after the American Civil Liberties challenged the signature provision, saying it could force people to violate social distancing restrictions.
Virginia also relaxed its signature rules — and the governor also signed legislation from the newly Democrat-controlled state Legislature allowing no-excuse absentee voting.
Similar challenges over witness requirements in North Carolina, Virginia, South Carolina, Missouri, Minnesota and the Dakotas are working through the courts.
In Kentucky, they are challenging the state’s photo ID requirement for mail-in ballots, arguing that coronavirus closures at the DMV make it impossible for voters to obtain a driver’s license.
In Alabama, progressives won a decision from a lower court against some of the state’s rules on photo ID and witness signature requirements, with the judge saying voters would “risk death” by following the rules.
But the U.S. Supreme Court stayed that ruling in a 5-4 decision, siding with Alabama, which said it gave voters months to copy their IDs and have a notary public or two witnesses watch them sign their ballots.
A similar ruling was issued from the high court in April involving Wisconsin. A lower court had granted nearly an extra week for absentee ballots to be received, but again the conservative wing of the high court struck that change down.
In Texas, where a valid excuse is still needed to vote absentee, Hispanic-rights groups asked courts to create a coronavirus exception, arguing fear of contracting the disease should count as a disability, which is one of the specific exemptions already in state law.
Both the state Supreme Court and a federal appeals court rejected that argument, and the Supreme Court left those rulings intact for the primaries. The matter could come back to the justices before November, though.
Marge Baker, executive director for the People for the American Way, said the lawsuits must move forward because many states have significant barriers to mail-in voting despite the threat of spreading COVID-19 at the polls.
“In Pennsylvania, the Trump campaign is actively trying to make it even harder to vote safely in November,” she said. “Democracies thrive where access to the ballot is streamlined, not where voters have to navigate a dangerous obstacle course and risk their health in order to cast their vote and have that vote counted.”
The Trump campaign has sued Pennsylvania claiming its mail-in ballot system produced “chaos” during that state’s June primary, with people dropping ballots at shopping centers and retirement centers.
States like California, meanwhile, are planning to send mail-in ballots to every registered voter this year.
That raises serious problems, said Curt Levey, president of the Committee for Justice.
“Common sense alone tells you that putting millions of blank ballots in the mail is a recipe for fraud,” he said.
He said blank ballots could be stolen and cast, or one person in a home could fill out someone else’s ballot without permission.
“Moreover, having mailed ballots sitting on every kitchen table is an invitation for activists to go door to door pressuring people to vote when they don’t want to or pressuring them to vote for a candidate they wouldn’t have otherwise voted for,” he said. “Republicans have the most reason to be concerned because research shows that voting fraud, when it occurs, tends to favor Democrat candidates.”
In Champaign County, Illinois, duplicative ballots were sent to voters who requested to vote by mail, according to an investigation by WCIA, a CBS News affiliate.
“This led to some voters receiving two, three, or possibly more duplicative ballots,” said Rep. Rodney Davis, Illinois Republican, in a letter to county officials.
As ranking member of the House Administration Committee, Mr. Davis launched inquiries to 10 cities and counties that experienced problems ranging from the closure of in-person voting locations to stacks of unanswered absentee ballots requests.
He is demanding more congressional oversight of the millions of taxpayer dollars sent to these localities in the CARES Act, a coronavirus relief package approved in May.
“Less than 100 days until Election Day and we have yet to examine how states have used the $400 million Congress provided in the CARES Act to help administer elections during a pandemic,” Mr. Davis told The Washington Times. “That is this committee’s role, but Democrats are ignoring the reality by refusing to talk about the very real problems we saw play out in primaries across the country, which have mostly stemmed from moving too quickly to expand mail-in voting.”
House Democrats, though, are looking for more cash.
They criticized the Senate GOP’s latest coronavirus relief bill for not including any additional money.
House Democrats’ version includes $3.6 billion, which Rep. Zoe Lofgren, California Democrat and chair of the House Administration Committee, said will reduce crowding and support mail-in voting.
Sign up for Daily Newsletters
Copyright © 2020 The Washington Times, LLC.
Click
here for reprint permission.

Share